As the roles of pregnancy and primary child-rearing, women's natural tendency is to engage in safe and easy activities within a relatively small familiar range centered on home, and have stronger attraction; while men's natural tendency is to explore and adventure everywhere, looking for women or collecting resources for women, and dealing with many complex or difficult situations far away from home. Modern transportation technology has changed the distance of movement more than the nature of movement. Women tend to need to judge which men perform better and achieve better work results. The difficulty of this judgment is lower than the difficulty of achieving the work results itself, which means that men's comprehensive processing ability is statistically stronger. Or you can understand it this way, men undertake greater survival and evolution pressure, things that challenge the physiological limits of humans are mainly done by men, the survival of the fittest within humans is mainly reflected in the competition between men, so men have stronger comprehensive processing ability. However, women's love, beauty, and procreating are mainly not processing abilities, but they are particularly important, so you can also think that women have stronger comprehensive abilities than men. Imagine that in an ideal cooperation model, women and men are not equal in many aspects, because they have divisions of labor and complement each other in terms of functions, and the satisfaction of both with their lives are almost equal, which means that in the next reincarnation, the number of souls who voluntarily choose to be women and the number of souls who voluntarily choose to be men are almost equal.
This ideal model seems stable in theory, but it's not stable from historical experience, partly because in this model, men have stronger logical thinking ability, stronger physical strength and spatial movement control, which means more control over economic activities, and greater potential to control and exploit the opposite sex. If the moral levels of men and women are almost the same, and this level is not very high — in fact, it's not very high in most of history — women will be more easily controlled and exploited, their economic control will be reduced, and their education level will also be reduced, which makes it more difficult for them to get rid of the disadvantageous position, and this makes the moral level of men appear to be lower, although most of the terrible things are manipulated or carried out by hostile galactics. Therefore, women think that they should have more privileges, and men should be systematically weakened, so that women will not be at disadvantage in the gender war.
Obviously, from historical experience, achieving a balance of confrontation ability is a realistic solution, which means that the systematic abuse of men is reasonable in a certain sense. Due to the natural differences between men and women, pursuing a balance of confrontation ability means that there will be an imbalance in satisfaction or function, which leads to the overall happiness and overall productivity of the family or society not being in the best or even good condition.
However, the balance of confrontation ability is not the only truth. The premise for the balance of confrontation ability becoming a reasonable solution is that, both women and men are in a state of seizing or defending or competing for interests, and a confrontational mindset. If both sides are in a cooperative mindset, they will tend to return to the ideal model, and jointly explore how to achieve greater overall interests and more optimized distribution of interests. Moreover, loving someone often means that within a certain range, you not only want to make a fair deal with her or him, but also want that person to get more. If both sides think so, it's very conducive to establishing a cooperative relationship. On the other hand, this is also related to the flexibility of both sides' thinking. Below I'll describe a process that partly shields or invalidates female supremacism.
Some sense of cooperative women and men both understand that the society needs a certain degree of female supremacism, and the specific degree is related to the moral level of society, mainly men.
Cooperative women may moderately oppose, or moderately support female supremacism, that is, moderately oppress all men on the macro level. Then make additional compensation to cooperative men who can be contacted, because they know these men are safe "friendly forces". This is a bit like a retailer raising the public price, but providing additional discounts to VIPs.
Cooperative men may moderately support, or moderately oppose female supremacism, at this time, they will lose the love of many women, but they don't care much, because they care more about the love of cooperative women. Cooperative women and cooperative men can consciously play the roles of bulls and bears, and better adjust the "market price" through cooperation.
Okay, I'll formally think about this topic below.
As the roles of pregnancy and primary child-rearing, women's natural tendency is to engage in safe and easy activities within a relatively small familiar range centered on home, and have stronger attraction; while men's natural tendency is to explore and adventure everywhere, looking for women or collecting resources for women, and dealing with many complex or difficult situations far away from home. Modern transportation technology has changed the distance of movement more than the nature of movement. Women tend to need to judge which men perform better and achieve better work results. The difficulty of this judgment is lower than the difficulty of achieving the work results itself, which means that men's comprehensive processing ability is statistically stronger. Or you can understand it this way, men undertake greater survival and evolution pressure, things that challenge the physiological limits of humans are mainly done by men, the survival of the fittest within humans is mainly reflected in the competition between men, so men have stronger comprehensive processing ability. However, women's love, beauty, and procreating are mainly not processing abilities, but they are particularly important, so you can also think that women have stronger comprehensive abilities than men. Imagine that in an ideal cooperation model, women and men are not equal in many aspects, because they have divisions of labor and complement each other in terms of functions, and the satisfaction of both with their lives are almost equal, which means that in the next reincarnation, the number of souls who voluntarily choose to be women and the number of souls who voluntarily choose to be men are almost equal.
This ideal model seems stable in theory, but it's not stable from historical experience, partly because in this model, men have stronger logical thinking ability, stronger physical strength and spatial movement control, which means more control over economic activities, and greater potential to control and exploit the opposite sex. If the moral levels of men and women are almost the same, and this level is not very high — in fact, it's not very high in most of history — women will be more easily controlled and exploited, their economic control will be reduced, and their education level will also be reduced, which makes it more difficult for them to get rid of the disadvantageous position, and this makes the moral level of men appear to be lower, although most of the terrible things are manipulated or carried out by hostile galactics. Therefore, women think that they should have more privileges, and men should be systematically weakened, so that women will not be at disadvantage in the gender war.
Obviously, from historical experience, achieving a balance of confrontation ability is a realistic solution, which means that the systematic abuse of men is reasonable in a certain sense. Due to the natural differences between men and women, pursuing a balance of confrontation ability means that there will be an imbalance in satisfaction or function, which leads to the overall happiness and overall productivity of the family or society not being in the best or even good condition.
However, the balance of confrontation ability is not the only truth. The premise for the balance of confrontation ability becoming a reasonable solution is that, both women and men are in a state of seizing or defending or competing for interests, and a confrontational mindset. If both sides are in a cooperative mindset, they will tend to return to the ideal model, and jointly explore how to achieve greater overall interests and more optimized distribution of interests. Moreover, loving someone often means that within a certain range, you not only want to make a fair deal with her or him, but also want that person to get more. If both sides think so, it's very conducive to establishing a cooperative relationship. On the other hand, this is also related to the flexibility of both sides' thinking. Below I'll describe a process that partly shields or invalidates female supremacism.
Some sense of cooperative women and men both understand that the society needs a certain degree of female supremacism, and the specific degree is related to the moral level of society, mainly men.
Cooperative women may moderately oppose, or moderately support female supremacism, that is, moderately oppress all men on the macro level. Then make additional compensation to cooperative men who can be contacted, because they know these men are safe "friendly forces". This is a bit like a retailer raising the public price, but providing additional discounts to VIPs.
Cooperative men may moderately support, or moderately oppose female supremacism, at this time, they will lose the love of many women, but they don't care much, because they care more about the love of cooperative women. Cooperative women and cooperative men can consciously play the roles of bulls and bears, and better adjust the "market price" through cooperation.
Option three seems to be respectful to both sexes. That might work (even here) - if implemented.
Thank you, Tunia, for your service to All/One!
I will definitely enjoy being back in a galactic society again whether earth or Sirius.