My dearest brothers and sisters,
This is Tunia speaking. I love you so very much.
I have a short message for you today.
Most people on Earth are afraid, and also have unresolved old pain. Therefore, most people on Earth aren't using arguments and debate as a way to find truth. Rather, they use it as a tool to convince others that they're right, so that they can feel a bit less afraid.
Of course, when everyone does this -- and on Earth, nearly everyone does this -- then everyone loses.
On Earth, there's a concept called nuance trolling. It is: intentionally muddying the waters by claiming that a situation that is pretty clear, is actually very complicated.
So for example, nuance trolling would be arguing that you can't say that Israel is committing a genocide (which in my opinion it is doing), because the situation is so very complicated and so very nuanced. Nuance trolling might be a claim that you can't say that Israel is committing an, in my opinion, genocide unless that argument also addresses this and this and this and this point.
While the people of Earth have created the concept of nuance trolling, personally I would frame it as people having double standards of nuance. So that would be:
Israel defenders don't accept any nuance when it comes to the 7th of October attacks. If you bring in the nuance and context that Palestinians grew up in an (in my opinion) open-air prison, then how dare you, you are an anti-semite. So nuance, or claims that it's complicated, aren't allowed at all when it comes to October 7th. And to be clear, I do not condone the October 7th attacks.
At the same time, when it comes to the morality of Israel's response, then suddenly we need endless amounts of nuance, and the situation is so very complicated.
So basically, double standards of nuance are: if we do something bad, then the situation is complex and nuanced. But if you do something bad, then you're just evil.
I'm discussing Israel here, but obviously there are also other examples. If in America you correctly say that Russia's special military operation in Ukraine is more morally complex than "Russia bad", then you're a Putin apologist or a Russian agent. But if you say that America committed genocide on native Americans, now suddenly the situation is very complex and nuanced. It's the same double standards of nuance: if we do something bad, then the situation is complex and nuanced. But if you do something bad, then you're just evil.
To be clear, while I think America did commit genocide on native Americans, I don't think that present-day Americans need to feel shame for that, because it wasn't them who did it, it was their ancestors. I believe in acknowledging reality, but not in shaming people just because other people in their group or in their family tree did something bad in the past. Also, I think the USA is still a great country.
These double standards of nuance probably just come from the fact that people genuinely perceive the situation as complex when they do something evil, and as clear-cut if someone they dislike does something evil. It's the old observation that people judge themselves by their intentions -- us Israelis must remain safe, at any cost -- and others by their actions. After all, when you cut someone off in traffic, then you're in a hurry and you had a bad day, but when someone cuts you off it's inexcusable. If you're in a bad relationship then it's complex, but if someone else is in a bad relationship then it's obvious what to do.
Still, I do think it's useful to be aware of these double standards of nuance, so that if someone says that you can't make a claim unless you address these points, then consider if they are applying the same nuance-standards to their own claims that their enemies are evil. Also, if you have in your head that a certain group of people is just plain evil and that's that, consider if you are maybe applying different standards of nuance to them than you are applying to yourself and to groups that you do like.
I hope this was helpful. Have a good week.
I love you so very much,
Your star sister,
Tunia
I don't have something to say in particular, just want to leave a positive comment. =))
The so called benevolent alien races like yours who are presently dominating the planetary liberation movement as well as your prominent Contactees on the Earth, just look like butchers of a slaughterhouse. These butchers never reveal the information that the Councils are actually terrorist organisations who are murdering innocent human beings of the Earth through poverty and wars. These butchers never reveal that the Cabal is actually under the control of the Galactic Federation. These butchers never reveal that there is no need to follow the orders of the Councils and that the Earth can be liberated within just a few hours with the help of the Urmah Felines. First humans are scammed by giving them false information, then they are blamed for their actions ! During Nazi Germany the Nazis were also claiming that the Jews were facing torture because of their own actions that they did in the past. And now you are saying statements similar to the Nazis that humans are suffering because of their own actions that they made in the past.
The Feline Confederation has never trusted the Galactic Federation and disobeyed the corrupted orders of the Councils many times in the past, after the last reset. They also don't sign agreements with the evil aliens and ETs. Is their collective destroyed because of all this? The answer is a NO ! Instead their Collective now rivals the power of the entire Galactic Federation combined ! So this proves that plans can be changed and the timelines too.
There are actually four main reasons why the Felines and Taygetans are not able to liberate the Earth-
1) No support from normal Humans Beings.
2) No support from Lightworkers.
3) Embargo placed by orders of the Galactic Councils.
4) A possible Civil War with member races of the Councils.
Reason 1 and 2 are created by the so called benevolent alien races like yours, because the humans as well as the lightworkers are scammed with wrong information by the prominent Contactees. Reason 3 is also your doing because the member races of the Councils first vote and then only orders are passed. Reason 1, 2 and 3 are responsible for creating reason 4.
Nevertheless, it is actually the so called benevolent alien races like yours who first create the Problem; and when some beings try to solve that problem you stop them from solving that problem. And when those beings who wanted to solve the problem are unable to solve it because of the actions of so called benevolent aliens like you; you start blaming those beings that they are just doing a drama.
Using manipulative nonsensical language that you aliens are using, like in this channeling won't work any longer. You all are exposed now.
He that WILL NOT reason is a Bigot.
He that CANNOT reason is a Fool.
He that DARE NOT reason is a Slave.
—H. DRUMMOND